Preserving Language, Resolving Conflict: Insights from Aceh and Patani
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v14i1.1898Keywords:
(De)Securitization, Language Preservation, Language Policy, Political Decision (SDG 16)Abstract
The preservation of local languages is critical in conflict-affected regions. Yet, a significant gap exists in comparative analysis exploring how divergent political settlements—post-conflict settlement versus ongoing conflict—shape language preservation strategies and outcomes. This study investigates how the de-securitization of language in Aceh, Indonesia, versus the ongoing language securitization in Patani, Thailand, produces fundamentally different strategies and challenges for revitalization. Employing a comparative case study methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 stakeholders across both regions, performed non-participatory observation, and analyzed policy documents. Our findings reveal that Aceh’s formal recognition is undermined by implementation gaps, leading to institutional decay, while Patani’s grassroots efforts are constrained by state suspicion, fostering a model of community resilience. The study concludes that the state’s political decision to (de)securitize a minority language is the pivotal factor determining whether preservation efforts can achieve sustainable, institutionalized vitality beyond mere survival. This research offers a nuanced model for understanding the state’s central role in peacebuilding (SDG 16) through linguistic diversity, providing vital insights for language preservation strategies in other multilingual, conflict-affected regions.
References
Abdrakhmanov, K. (2023). Instrumentalization of Minorities vs. Instruments of Minority Rights. Conflict Prevention through Integration Based on Respect for Diversity and Minority Rights. Peace Human Rights Governance, 7(1), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-phrg-2023-1-6
Abdullah, Syahri, A., Hamamah, F., Gafur, A., & Sholeh, A. (2024). Fulfillment of The Living Rights of Children the Victims of Divorce in the Muslim Community of Lombok, Indonesia. El-Usrah, 7(1), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.22281
Abidin, K., Darna, A., Nuzul, A., A. Samad, S. A., & Samad, M. (2025). Determinants of Domestic Violence in Indonesia from a Gender and Sociology of Law Perspective. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 8(2), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.22373/0t3bc059
Aghblagh, M. M., & Rajabi, S. A. (2023). Alienated in my hometown: pro-official family language policies and identity conflict in the city of Tabriz. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(7), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1842427
Akmal, S., & Masni, M. (2024, December 19). Lessons from Aceh: How language unites and segregates in conflicts. The Jakarta Post.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.
Awal, A. (2024). Endangered Languages: A Systematic Qualitative Study of Socio-Cultural Impacts and Revitalisation. Sustainable Multilingualism, 25(1), 65–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2024-0013
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chu, M. N., & Le, P. T. N. (2020). Language Policy Strategies of Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies, 01(02), 2050009. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2717541320500096
Collins, J. T. (2018). Southeast Asia. Malay, World Language: A Short History. In Journal of Southeast Asian Studies (Vol. 32, Issue 3). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463401240259
Draper, J., Sobieszczyk, T., Crumpton, C. D., Lefferts, H. L., & Chachavalpongpun, P. (2019). Racial “Othering” in Thailand: Quantitative Evidence, Causes, and Consequences. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 25(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2019.1639425
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters.
Haltsova, O., Obolentsev, V., Smetanina, N., Fivkin, P., & Panova, S. (2024). Preventing Domestic Violence Under Martial Law in Ukraine. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(2), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.24146
Hama, H. H. (2022). The Securitization and De-Securitization of Kurdish Societal Security in Turkey, Iraq, Iran, And Syria. World Affairs, 183(4), 291–314.
Haslinger, P. (2022). Language conflicts and securitization in multilingual societies. Language Problems and Language Planning, 46(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00088.has
Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. Tesol Quarterly, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x
Huebner, T. (2019). Language Policy and Bilingual Education in Thailand: Reconciling the Past, Anticipating the Future. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(1), 19–29. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/168570
Jiang, B., Fan, Q., Zhou, J., & Li, L. (2025). Effectiveness evaluation and application of large language model in data-driven teaching decision-making. International Journal of Evaluation & Research in Education, 14(3), 2263-2277. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.33374
Karabacak, N. (2025). Revitalizing the Local Laz Language Under Threat Through Education: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 12(5), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2170
Lo Bianco, J. (2019). Uncompromising talk, linguistic grievance, and language policy: Thailand’s deep south conflict zone. In The Palgrave Handbook of Languages and Conflict (pp. 295–330). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04825-9_14
Lo Bianco, J. (2019). Uncompromising Talk, Linguistic Grievance, and Language Policy: Thailand’s Deep South Conflict Zone. In: Kelly, M., Footitt, H., Salama-Carr, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Languages and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04825-9_14
Maliwat, R. (2021, December 23). Language Policy and Education in Southeast Asia. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/language-policy-and-education-in-southeast-asia/
Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (2017). Ethnolinguistic dilemma and static maintenance syndrome: A study of language policies and language perceptions in Pakistan. Language Problems and Language Planning, 41(1), 66-86. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.41.1.04man
McCargo, D. (2004). Rethinking Thailand’s Southern Violence. NUS Press.
McCargo, D. (2012). Southern Thailand: The Trouble with Autonomy. In MA Miller (Ed.), Autonomy and Armed Separatism in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 217–234).
na Thalang, C. (2023). Resolving the Conflict in Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces: Contentions between Upholding State Authority and Human Rights within the asean Context. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 26(2-3), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-26020004
Ng, M. L., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. H., Lai, T. T., & Tan, R. S. E. (2025). Exploring Obstacles and Effectiveness of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) Approach in EFL Speaking Instruction: Insights from an Adult EFL Classroom. World Journal of English Language, 15(6), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n6p151
Oztürk, A., & Oztürk, S. (2023). Recognition Paradox: Minority Language Recognition, Political Trust, and Ethnic Demands.
Qassrawi, R., & al Karasneh, S. M. (2025). Redefinition of human-centric skills in language education in the AI-driven era. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.43082
Roche, G. (2019). Articulating language oppression: colonialism, coloniality and the erasure of Tibet’s minority languages. Patterns of Prejudice, 53(5), 487–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1662074
Roe, P. (2002). Misperception and Ethnic Conflict: Transylvania’s Societal Security Dilemma. In Source: Review of International Studies (Vol. 28, Issue 1).
Roe, P. (2004). Securitization and Minority Rights: Conditions of Desecuritization. Security Dialogue, 35(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010604047527
Rusdiansyah, Gunawan, W., Kurniawan, E., & Hakim, M. A. (2025). Navigating inconsistencies: The challenges of implementing multilingual education policy in rural Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101601
Salman, A. (2024). Role of Social Media Dependency Factors and Tabayyun Towards Youth Behaviour on Social Media. Islamiyyat, 46(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2024-4602-19
Simpson, A. (2021). Language and the building of nations in Southeast Asia. In The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia: A comprehensive guide (pp. 927–955). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110558142-038
Situmorang, K., & Pramusita, S. M. (2025). Exploring ‘English’ in an EMI nursing program: Native English varieties, ELF, and translingual practices. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.35359
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Phillipson, R. (1995). Linguistic human rights. Mouton de Gruyter.
Sneddon, J. (2003). The Indonesian Language. UNSW Press.
Sneddon, J. N. (2003). The Indonesian Language: Its History and Role in Modern Society. UNSW Press.
Waever, O. (1993). Securitization and Desecuritization. Centre for Peace and Conflict Research. http://www.ciaonet.org/book/lipschutz/lipschutz13.html
Wright, S. (2004). Language Policy and Language Planning: From Nationalism to Globalisation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wu, Y., & Othman, J. (2025). Foreign teachers’ translanguaging beliefs and practices in English-medium classrooms at a Chinese international school. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.39830
Yunariono, B. (2025). The role of educational institutions in preserving the Malay language: Insights from the Patani ethnic community in southern Thailand. Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.5.1.2025.98
Zainullah, M. (2023). The Compatibility of Indonesia’s Job Creation Law Number 11 of 2020 with United Nations Guiding Principles on Business And Human Rights. Jurisdictie, 14(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v14i1.21301
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saiful Akmal, Melly Masni, Anwar Koma, Ahmad Faizuddin, Nissa 'Ulfitri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
