The Development of Science Learning Device Based on Interconnected Integration in Increasing Critical and Creative Thinking Students'

Lelya Hilda; Rosimah Lubis; Tatta Herawati Daulae

doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v8i1.341

Authors

Lelya Hilda Institut Agama Islam Negeri Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia Author
Rosimah Lubis Institut Agama Islam Negeri Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia Author
Tatta Herawati Daulae Institut Agama Islam Negeri Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v8i1.341

Keywords:

Integration, Interconnection, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, Science Learning

Abstract

Interconnected Integration based learning is really needed to narrow the dualism space or the science dichotomy which separates between general education and religion education which then has an impact on the separation and segregation of religious awareness and general science. In the learning process, critical and creative thinking skills are very important, because it can make people become more mentally flexible, open and easy to adapt to various situations and problems. The type of this research was research and development. The development model used in this study was a modification of Borg and Gall's development stage which states that there were 10 stages in research and development. The research results showed that the instructional materials produced had very good validity (89%), very practical (91.19% by teachers and 86.21% by students and very efficient with the average critical and creative thinking (pretest) of students; 66.31 and posttest 80.26, and the results of the t-test count = 15.712 with sig 0.00 <0.05. This shows that there were significant differences before being treated and after treated by using the interconnection approach in improving students' critical and creative thinking.

References

Abdullah, A. (2008). Desain Pengembangan Akademik IAIN menuju UIN Sunan Kalijaga: dari Pendekatan Dikotomis-Anatomis ke Arah integratif-interdisiplinary dalam Bagir, Zainan Abidin, Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Abdullah, A. (2010). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Paradigma Integratif-Interkonenktif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Abdullah, A., & Tabrani ZA. (2018). Orientation of Education in Shaping the Intellectual Intelligence of Children. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8200–8204. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12523

Achinike, H., & Ogbonna, S. (2016). Federalism Critical Arguments as the Transfigurations of Nigerian Federalism. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 4(3), 369-382. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v4i3.110

Aizikovitsh-Udi, Einav and Amit, Miriam. (2011). Developing the skills of Critical and Creative Thinking by Probability Teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1087–1091.

Anggela, M., Masril & Darvina, Y. (2013). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Bermuatan Nilai-Nilai Karakter Pada Materi Usaha dan Moment Untuk Pembelajaran Fisika Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Pillar Physict Education, 1, 63-70.

Borg, W.R. and Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational Research: On Introduction. (4th ed.), New York: Longman Inc.

Depdiknas. (2003). UU RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.

Hilda, L. (2015). Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Proses Pembelajaran (Telaah Kurikulum 2013). Jurnal Darul Ilmi, 03 (01), 69-84.

Iakovos, T. (2011). Critical and Creative Thinking in the English Language Classroom. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 1( 8), 82-86.

Idris, S., Tabrani ZA, & Sulaiman, F. (2018). Critical Education Paradigm in the Perspective of Islamic Education. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8226–8230. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12529

Istarani. (2011). 58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Medan: Media Persada.

Karakoc, M. (2016). The Significance of Critical Thinking Ability in terms of Education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6 (7), 81-84.

Koballa and Chiapetta. (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary School. USA: Pearson.

Liliasari. (2001). Model Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Calon Guru sebagai Kecenderungan Baru pada Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 2 (1), 54-56.

Mudjijo. (1995). Tes Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Naquib, S.M. (1993). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

Rahayu, P., Mulyani, S. dan Miswadi, S.S. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelaran Problem Base Melalui Lesson Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, (1), 63-70.

Rohman, F. & Wahyudin, Aan. (2017). Konsep Pendidikan Islam Integratif-Interkonektif Perspektif Kitab Wadhaif Al-Muta’allim. Al Hikmah Jurnal Studi Keislaman. 7 (1). http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidika. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sungkowo. (2010). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis TIK. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Wan Sabri, Zuriati, W.F., Tasmin, A.R. and Ahmad, N.A. (2015). Islamic Civilization: Its Signifigance in al-Faruqi’s Islamization of Knowledge. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 7 (June), 49-57.

Winarti. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Bermuatan Integrasi Islam-Sains untuk Menanamkan Nilai-Nilai Spritual Siswa Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal JPFK, 1(2), 54 – 60.

Yuliani, K. and Saragih, Sahat. (2015). The Development of Learning Devices Based Guided Discovery Model to Improve Understanding Concept and Critical Thinking Mathematically Ability of Students at Islamic Junior High School of Medan Department of Mathematics Science Faculty, State University of Medan, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (24), 116-128.